Poe’s husband to renounce US citizenship

The presidential aspirant gives the assurance that Filipinos 'will not have an American boy in Malacañang' in the person of her husband Neil Llamanzares

FAMILY. From L-R: Senator Grace Poe's son Brian, husband Neil Llamanzares, and mother Susan Roces.

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – Amid questions over her and her family’s citizenship, Senator Grace Poe said her husband would renounce his American citizenship to show “support” for her administration.

Poe’s husband Teodoro "Neil" Misael Llamanzares and their 3 children enjoy dual citizenship – of the United States and the Philippines.

“’Yan ang ginagawang issue sa ngayon at tanggap naman namin sapagkat isa itong political na konsiderasyon. Nag-usap na kami ng aking asawa. Bagama't by birth s'ya naging [US] citizen, para mawala na lahat ng pagdududa, at ipakita ang kumpyansa sa aking administrasyon, s'ya po ay talaga namang magre-renounce,” Poe said in an interview with dzMM on Wednesday, November 4.

(That's one of the issues now because this is a political consideration. My husband and I already talked about this. Although he became a US citizen by birth, he would renounce it to erase all doubts and for him to show his confidence in my administration.)

Llamanzares was born to Filipino parents who were then studying and working in the US. Unlike Philippine citizenship law which requires at least 1 parent to be a Filipino, American laws consider as citizens those people born in their country.

Poe did not give other details of her husband’s planned renunciation of American citizenship. She, however, assured the public that Filipinos would not have an “American boy in Malacañang.”

“Maraming proseso. Kailangan i-report and iyong Statements of Assets and Liabilities for the last 5 years...so pupunta dun (US embassy), kailangan namin kolektahin lahat ng dokumento. Pero huwag kayong mag-alala, hindi kayo magkakaroon ng American boy sa Malacañang,” Poe said.

(There are many processes. You have to report your Statements of Assets and Liabilities for the last 5 years. So he will go to the US embassy, we need to collect all documents. You will not have an American boy in Malacañang.)

Rappler initially reported that Llamanzares would renounce his US citizenship once Poe wins.

After the interview, Rappler tried to clarify the timeline with Poe.

In a clarificatory message, the senator's office said Llamanzares "is currently in the process of renouncing."

"He will file his application once all pertinent documents have been gathered in compliance with the renunciation process. For the record, Mr. Llamanzares's renunciation of his American citizenship is not dependent on whether Grace Poe becomes president, as the article seems to suggest, but is predicated on the fact that the Philippines is their place of domicile and work," the statement said.

Children

As for her kids – Brian, 23; Hanna, 17; and Anika, 11 – Poe said she would not force them to do anything for her. After all, she said, her two daughters are still minors.

Her son Brian was born in 1992 in Washington, DC. Her two daughters, meanwhile, were born in the Philippines in 1998 and 2004. (READ: TIMELINE: Grace Poe's citizenship, residency)

“Si Brian ay 23 years old. Bilang magulang, kinakausap ko na s'ya, 'wag s'ya magdedesisyon para sa 'kin lamang. Bilang magulang, hahayaan mo ang anak mo rin gumawa ng sariling desisyon,” Poe said, even as she claims her son would not treat is as a “sacrifice” to renounce his US citizenship.

(Brian is already 23 years old. As a parent, I already talk to him about this. I told him not to decide solely for me. As a parent, you would let your child make his own decision.)

Poe maintained that having family members who are also US citizens is not a threat to the Philippines. After all, she said, there are Supreme Court justices and a former President who has either a husband or children who are US citizens. –Rappler.com

The Fair Election Act: Size isn’t everything or why large posters may have to yield to free speech

In the midst of the 2013 elections, a tarpaulin was posted within the front walls of a cathedral in Bacolod City. The tarpaulin, measuring approximately 6 feet x 10 feet, had the words “Team Patay (Dead)” with an X mark, and “Team Buhay (Alive)” with a ? mark. Certain electoral candidates were then classified to either Team Patayor Team Buhay, depending on their vote on the Reproductive Health Law.

Citing violations on size limitations prescribed by the implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 9006, otherwise known as the Fair Election Act, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) ordered the removal of the tarpaulin.

The Fair Election Act, it must be noted, was enacted consistent with the Constitutional provision of ensuring equal opportunity for public service, including access to media, time, and space, and ensuring free, orderly, honest, peaceful and credible elections. It was likewise passed to ensure that bona fide candidates for any public office shall be free from any form of harassment and discrimination. The law accordingly provides, among others, limitations on the use and display of election propaganda. In this case, the lawful size for election propaganda should not exceed 2 feet x 3 feet. Because the tarpaulin did exceed the prescribed size, its removal was ordered. Elsewise, the tarpaulin’s proponents would run the risk of prosecution for an election offense.

Essential to the Comelec’s resolution is its treatment of the tarpaulin as election propaganda, a campaign material, which is within its purview to regulate in the conduct of elections. True, the State through Comelec as one of its arms has the power to limit electoral advertisements in order to achieve what is envisioned by the law. There are some things worth noting in the Comelec’s order, however. The tarpaulin sought to be removed was neither sponsored nor paid for by any candidate. It was placed on private property and involved an expression of a private group’s advocacy on the Reproductive Health Law, although given an apparent electoral slant. Lastly, while the tarpaulin may influence the success or failure of the named candidates and political parties, this does not necessarily mean that it is election propaganda. These considerations are worth mentioning because they affect two related fundamental rights of an individual under our Constitution, the freedom of speech and the freedom of expression, which do not only cover vocal speech but also include other symbolic manners of communication.

In this case, the tarpaulin contained speech on a matter of public concern, particularly to express the proponents’ advocacy and view on the votes made in passing the Reproductive Health Law, albeit incidentally promoting or not promoting an electoral candidate. On the other hand, the Comelec’s order is anchored on the fact that the manner by which the opinion is expressed does not conform to the size requirements of the law and that if such will not be regulated, the same may be abused by some electoral candidates who could then solicit the help of private individuals to skirt the constitutional provision on equal opportunities for all candidates.

The Supreme Court, when this matter was brought before it, recognized that the form of expression is just as important as the information conveyed, that it forms part of the expression. It said that size does matter. This is because the size -- a larger tarpaulin, that is -- enhances efficiency in communication, underscores the importance of the message to the reader and allows for more inceptions of ideas, catalyze reactions to advocacies, and contribute to a more educated and reasoned electorate. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court held that the guarantee of freedom of expression to individuals without any relationship to any political candidate should not be held hostage to the possibility of abuse by those seeking to be elected. It held that no unreasonable restrictions of the fundamental and preferred right to expression of the electorate during a political contest, no matter how seemingly benign, will be tolerated.

Indeed, democracy will never be one without free speech and expression. After all, the sovereign people ought to have a say on matters affecting the State, especially in the context of an election. It is amazing how one oversized tarpaulin can stir the sensibilities of people and start a debate on the entitlement to freedom of speech and expression. But perhaps when the tarpaulin, along with other media by which ideas and advocacies are conveyed, have served their purpose, a more mature and better informed electorate will emerge, one not so much influenced by dimensional presentations but by the substance of the idea that is sought to be conveyed. That, in true essence, is the bedrock upon which free speech and expression rest.

Genie Celini D. Nuevo is an Associate of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices, Davao Branch.

gdnuevo@accralaw.com

[082]224-0996

source:  Businessworld

CA junks Junjun Binay’s petition vs second suspension order

THE Court of Appeals (CA) junked on Friday dismissed Makati City Mayor Junjun Binay’s petition questioning the second preventive suspension order issued against him by the Office of the Ombudsman over an alleged overpriced Makati Science High School building.

The appellate court, in a three-page decision, said the petition has been rendered moot, when the Ombudsman earlier ordered his dismissal due to the alleged Makati City Hall Building 2 overpriced project.

“Ombudsman Carpio-Morales and her 103-page joint decision pertaining to six other similar complaints against petitioner (Junjun Binay) involving alleged anomalies in the construction of the Makati car park ordered petitioner’s dismissal as Makati Mayor with perpetual disqualification from holding public office.” The CA’s resolution stated.  “This court takes judicial notice of the foregoing issuance, which became the subject of extensive coverage in both print and broadcast media. In light of this supervening event, we opined that whatever relief we grant to petitioner in this case, whether we will restrain, enjoin or nullify his preventive suspension, the same will no longer serve any practical value.

The CA explained that although Binay’s second preventive suspension has not prescribed, it has been deemed “overtaken, if not superseded, by the order of dismissal by Ombudsman (Conchita) Carpio-Morales.”

“Petitioner, having been dismissed from his post as Makati Mayor, will not be able to take it back, regardless of how we resolve the validity of his preventive suspension in the present case,” the CA continued.  “Accordingly, the petition is dismissed on ground of mootness.”

The administrative case stemmed from the alleged overpricing of Makati Science High School building by about P282 million.

source:  Manila Times

785 bets face perpetual disqualification over SOCE

MANILA, Philippines - At least 785 candidates face perpetual disqualification from holding public office for failing to file their statements of contributions and expenditures (SOCEs) twice, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) said yesterday.

Based on a report of the Comelec’s Campaign Finance Office, these candidates ran for local posts in 2007, 2010 and 2013.

Comelec spokesman James Jimenez said the candidates would be subjected to a preliminary investigation and cases would be filed before the agency’s Office of the Secretary of the Commission if probable cause is found.

“These cases can still be appealed. Under the rules, if you fail to file your SOCE twice, you will be disqualified and based on our lists, all are local (candidates),” Comelec Chairman Andres Bautista said.

Records show that officials of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao had the most number of SOCE delinquents with 194. 

The other regions with the non-SOCE filers are Calabarzon (88), Cordillera Administrative Region (70), Northern Mindanao (67), Central Luzon (60), Soccsksargen (59) and National Capital Region (54).

Cagayan Valley had 30, Central Visayas (25), Ilocos region and Mimaropa (23), Eastern Visayas (21), Davao region (18), Zamboanga peninsula (16), Bicol region and Western Visayas (15 each) and Caraga (7).

Under Comelec Resolution 9991, these candidates also face fines ranging from P20,000 to P60,000, depending on the position they ran for.

source:  Philippine Star

Ex-Canadian citizen cannot run for mayor in Batanes province, SC says

THE SUPREME Court has dismissed a Batanes mayoral bet’s petition seeking to reinstate his 2013 candidacy, saying his renouncement of Canadian citizenship does not automatically enable him to meet the residency requirement.

In an emailed statement, SC Public Information Office Chief Theodore O. Te said the SC en banc voted 11-0 to junk the petition by Rogelio Caballero against the Commission on Elections’ (Comelec) findings of material misrepresentations in his certificate of candidacy.

Since Mr. Caballero renounced his foreign citizenship on Sept. 13, 2012, only six months prior to the election, he could not meet the one-year residency requirement.

This rejected his argument that Comelec should have allowed him to run because he did not lose his domicile of origin when he was naturalized, having been born in the town.

He said that despite becoming a Canadian citizen, he merely left Uyugan temporarily and regularly vacationed in his hometown.

But the high court said naturalization in a foreign country results in the abandonment of his original domicile. It noted that to acquire Canadian citizenship, one must hold a permanent resident status, effectively transferring his domicile to Canada.

As a result, Mr. Caballero had to reestablish his domicile in Uyugan, which he only did when it renounced his citizenship on Sept. 13, 2012.

However, this falls short of the one-year residency requirement; the elections were held on May 13, 2013.

Since Mr. Caballero stated in his CoC (Certificate of Candidacy) that he had been a resident of Uyugan for one year prior to the elections, the high court affirmed the Comelec’s ruling that he committed material misrepresentation in his CoC. -- Vince Alvic Alexis F. Nonato

source:  Businessworld

Only One COC Per Candidate: Comelec

AN INDIVIDUAL can file another certificate of candidacy (COC) for a different position within the five-day filing period but he would have to withdraw the first one, Commission on Elections (Comelec) spokesman James Jimenez said yesterday.

“Under the rules, kapag may nag-file ng more than one COC, they are deemed not filed,” said Jimenez.

“If you file multiple COCs, yes, you can withdraw it as long as it is within the filing period,” he added.

Questions over the possibility were raised after the COC of Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte was filed by his chief-of-staff, Christopher Go, yesterday for reelection, to the dismay of his supporters who are pushing him to run for president.

Duterte’s move came as a surprise after rumors circulated that he is in Manila to file his COC for president at the Comelec main office in Manila.

Speculations were even fanned after throngs of Duterte supporters camped outside the Palacio del Gobernador, with some even shaving their heads to manifest their desire for him to run for president.

Friday is the last day for the filing of COCs for elective posts nationwide.

Based on the rules on substitution, election lawyer Romulo Macalintal said reelectionist Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada cannot substitute for Senator Grace Poe or Vice President Jejomar Binay if both are disqualified from running for president.

Macalintal said Poe cannot be substituted as because it is not allowed for an independent candidate.

He said Estrada cannot substitute for Binay because they are not party-mates.

Macalintal said even if Estrada can substitute for the two, he may also face legal problems since the Constitution provides that an elected president is not eligible for any election.

He said even if Estrada was allowed to run for president in 2010, the issue was not resolved by the Supreme Court because it became moot and academic when he lost to President Aquino. 

Estrada said he would only run for president in 2016 if Poe or Binay is disqualified. 

Jimenez also reminded those making fun of the “colorful” political aspirants that being declared a nuisance candidate is based on a person’s candidacy, not his personality.

“Ang tinutukoy na nuisance candidate is actually ‘yung candidate na makakagulo lamang or hindi makikitang maka-contribute significantly sa kabuuang proseso,” he said.

Under the Omnibus Election Code, an individual may be declared as a nuisance candidate “if it is shown that said certificate has been filed to put the election process in mockery or disrepute; or to cause confusion among the voters by the similarity of the names of the registered candidates; or by other circumstances or acts which clearly demonstrate that the candidate has no bona fide intention to run for the office.”

Among the more popular candidates who have filed their COCs this week are Daniel Magtira, who claims to be the “husband” of presidential sister Kris Aquino, and Romeo John Ygonia, also known as Archangel Lucifer.  

On December 10, the Comelec is set to come out with the final list of candidates for the 18,069 positions to be contested in the May polls after purging the list of those considered as nuisance candidates. – With Ashzel Hachero

source:  Malaya

Ombudsman orders dismissal of Junjun Binay

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales has ordered the dismissal of suspended Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin "Junjun" Binay Jr over the alleged overpricing of the Makati City Hall Parking Building II.

In ordering Binay's dismissal from service and perpetual disqualification from public office on Friday, October 9, Morales said in a statement that the "strong evidence" presented during administrative adjudication "remained unrebutted."

She said that there were irregularities in the design and architecture in several phases of the said city infrastructure project worth P2.28 billion, undertaken from 2007 to 2013.

The Ombudsman's decision recommends that Binay, who is expected to file his certificate of candidacy for Makati mayor next week, be barred from holding public office.

The Ombudsman also ordered the dismissal of 19 other Makati officials:

• Marjorie de Veyra
• Pio Kenneth Dasal
• Lorenza Amores
• Virginia Hernandez
• Line dela Peña
• Mario Badillo
• Leonila Querijero
• Raydes Pestaño
• Nelia Barlis
• Cecilio Lim III
• Arnel Cadangan
• Emerito Magat
• Connie Consulta
• Ulysses Orienza
• Giovanni Condes
• Manolito Uyaco
• Gerardo San Gabriel
• Eleno Mendoza Jr
• Rodel Nayve

Morales said that while Binay may file an appeal, the decision is "immediately executory."

Binay is also currently serving a 6-month preventive suspension order from the Ombudsman for the alleged overpricing of the Makati Science High School building.

'Binay intentionally closed his eyes to irregularities'

In a 103-page joint decision on 6 docketed complaints, the Ombudsman said that "flagrant anomalies" were found to have been committed by Binay and the other city officials in the design and construction of the Makati city hall parking building II's 6 phases. (WATCH: Red flags in 'overpriced' Makati infra projects)

It said that the services of Mana Architecture and Interior Design Company (MANA) were engaged without the benefit of public bidding in phase 1.

"The documents established badges of fraud committed by Binay, Jr. et.al. in manipulating the procurement to ensure the award of the contract to MANA; processing and approving a series of four (4) payments totaling to P11.97 million despite the incomplete submission of deliverables such as design plans, working drawings, and technical specifications," it said.

The Ombudsman said procurement violations were committed and there were no invitations to bid, contrary to Republic Act No 9184, or the Government Procurement Reform Act.

"A certified true copy of the publication obtained from the National Library showed that no advertisement for the invitations to bid was made as attested to by the publisher," it said.

The Ombudsman said there was "undue haste" in awarding the contract – the Makati Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) supposedly took just 11 days to complete the procurement process for the big infrastructure project.

It cited the Commission on Audit Fraud Audit Office’s Initial Evaluation Report which said that “the negotiated procurement adopted by the BAC was improper.”

The construction projects were ultimately awarded to Hilmarc’s Construction Corporation despite the lack of the required publication of the invitations to bid. It was also the lone bidder in 4 out of the 6 phases.

Moreover, the Ombudsman said that the construction project began "even in the absence of approved design standards, contract plans, agency cost estimates, detailed engineering and programs of work."

The joint decision also explained that there was supposed collusion among city officials and Hilmarc’s to manipulate the outcome of the 5 “public biddings” to ensure that Hilmarc’s would be the winning bidder.

Morales said Binay had the obligation to ensure that the contracts he was entering into were "fair, reasonable and advantageous to the government." Documents indicate that Binay approved the BAC resolutions, notices of awards, contracts and payments.

"By so acting, Binay intentionally closed his eyes to the irregularities by failing to observe utmost diligence," the Ombudsman added.

'Dismissal by press release, suspicious timing'

The Binay camp slammed the Ombudsman's decision as "dismissal by press release."

"Bistado na ang Ombudsman. Minadali nito ang order dahil sa Lunes ay magsisimula na ang filing ng CoCs (certificates of candidacy) para sa 2016 election. Ni wala pang kopya ng order na natanggap si Mayor. Dismissal by press release ang ginawa ng Ombudsman," vice presidential spokesperson Joey Salgado said in a statement.

(The Ombudsman has been exposed. It rushed this order because the filing of CoCs for the 2016 elections starts on Monday. The mayor has not even received a copy of the order. What the Ombudsman did was a dismissal by press release.)

Salgado said that Binay will face the legal challenge and will elevate it to court "to stop the administration's abuses and underhanded moves" against him.

In an interview on ANC, Binay's lawyer, Claro Certeza, also questioned what he called the "suspicious" timing of the Ombudsman's decision, as it comes just days from the start of the filing of COCs.

"We have to look at the bigger picture here. Look at the timing when the resolution is issued. It's about the time when parties are supposed to be filing their COC, then they issue such a resolution," Certeza said.

"You will agree with me that something like this will negatively impact both the Vice President and Mayor Junjun insofar as their aspirations to be elected are concerned," he added.

Vice President Jejomar Binay, who is also hounded by corruption allegations when he was Makati mayor, is seeking the presidency.

Certeza said that they were surprised by the Ombudsman's resolution. "We have already presented all evidences that we have to the Ombudsman, that's why we are surprised about this finding that they made."

The next step, he said, is to get a copy of the resolution, and once he has studied it, he will file an appeal with the Court of Appeals. The lawyer said, however, that "the problem here is that this decision is immediately executory."

"So I guess this is really their strategy, to see to it that at least with respect to the certification of candidacy, Mayor Binay will be really hard-pressed for time to seek any legal relief. The timing is very suspicious," he said.

Malacañang said in a statement that it respects the decision of the Office of the Ombudsman, "being an independent office from the Executive," and expects all other parties to do the same.

"In undertaking its constitutionally-mandated role, it is incumbent on all parties to abide by the decision and to avail of the legal remedies provided under law," said Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte. – Rappler.com